Who's "Moe" Paranoid Now?

"Maybe I'm paranoid, or old, or both, but when I'm at Cub Foods, I will keep writing checks ...
- Writer Doug Moe "in an article from "The Capital Times" out of Madison, WI

Welcome to my Biometric Payment Blog.

As biometric payments gain in popularity, it seemed time to create a blog that addresses common misperceptions regarding this new payment system.

It's understandable to have concerns over whether something is safe to use, but what I don't agree with, is when the media doesn't take the time to do any research whatsover, and instead, publishes their personal, unwarranted attacks on biometrics without taking the time to compare this new type of payment system with existing ones.

I'll start with an article that ran in The Capital Times, written by Doug Moe. Upon reading the article, I e-mailed the "The Capital Times" and they published a new, much more consumer friendly overview of biometric payments.

Click Below to Read the Original Article Published on Thursday

Cash Is Safer Than The Fingertip
From The Capital Times, Thu Jan 26 2006:

"CALL ME paranoid, but I don't want to pay for a loaf of bread with my finger. The opportunity presented itself over the weekend at my neighborhood grocery store, the Verona Road Cub...

Now let's take a look at the second article that The Capital Times published the day after I e-mailed them how silly it was for Moe to state his paranoia in an article...and two days after the original article:

Read the Second Article

Fingertip Payment: Cub Foods Has New 'Touch'

From The Capital Times, Sat Jan 28 2006: Madison shoppers have a new way to pay. A biometric payment system that allows you to pay for groceries with your finger was installed last week at Cub Foods' three area stores. It's the...



Let me quote Doug Moe again from the original article:

"A paranoid is just someone in possession of all the facts." Well, Moe,allow me to redefine your paranoia, because you don't have the facts. If you did, you would prefer biometrics to writing checks. I'm about to show you why. So with that said, let us end where we started with another of your brilliant guidelines to life:

"Well, as I said, maybe I'm paranoid, or old, or both, but when I'm at Cub I will keep writing checks"

Let's take a look at ol' Moe's safe, non-paranoid, payment instrument of choice.(click the check to enlarge)

There are, count 'em, 9 reasons to be paranoid about writing checks
They all provide "critical" personal financial information Moe.

I'll bet our man Moe has his "social security" or "driver's license" number on his checks.
How Many Moe checks will he write before his ID is stolen by some stooge?

On the Other Hand, Let's Put Our Finger on
Why Biometrics Provide a More Secure Transaction:

With Pay By Touch, in order to steal their financial information, you would need to be able to look under finger and guess which 40 data points are being measured. Now come up with 960 more (there can be more than 1000 data points on a finger) Finally, reverse engineer these data points into a fingerprint. Done yet? Now give it electrolytes, warmth or a pulse. Now you can use the fingerprint to steal funds. Wait, not yet, I almost forgot: Please enter their 7 digit PIN number. Okay, your done.

Report: Walmart, Costco looking at Pay by Touch

NEW YORK (FORTUNE) - Buying groceries with the touch of a finger could be closer than you think, if new research touting the benefits of biometric payment for retail giants like Wal-Mart, Target, and Costco is anything to go by.

The report, by Sanford Bernstein analyst Emme Kozloff, found that the use of so-called "electronic wallets" reduces the potential for fraud and identity theft, speeds up the checkout process, and most importantly, lowers transaction processing fees for retailers, improving their bottom line.

A 20% reduction in processing costs at big-box discounters like Wal-Mart over the next several years could result in a 3% to 4% increase in earnings per share by 2009, the report estimated.

"We believe both Wal-Mart (Research) and Costco (Research) are looking at it closely," Kozloff wrote. Here's the entire article:

Let your fingers do the paying

Wal-Mart, Costco weigh merits of allowing customers to pay by scanning fingerprints: report

January 24, 2006: 5:57 AM EST

NEW YORK (FORTUNE) - Buying groceries with the touch of a finger could be closer than you think, if new research touting the benefits of biometric payment for retail giants like Wal-Mart, Target, and Costco is anything to go by.

The report, by Sanford Bernstein analyst Emme Kozloff, found that the use of so-called "electronic wallets" reduces the potential for fraud and identity theft, speeds up the checkout process, and most importantly, lowers transaction processing fees for retailers, improving their bottom line. A 20% reduction in processing costs at big-box discounters like Wal-Mart over the next several years could result in a 3% to 4% increase in earnings per share by 2009, the report estimated. "We believe both Wal-Mart (Research) and CostcoResearch) are looking at it closely," Kozloff wrote. (Both companies declined to comment.) (

More from FORTUNE Most Admired in your state Scared of another selloff? Go global The inside story of a Wall Street battle royal FORTUNE 500 Current Issue Subscribe to Fortune

Already in use at supermarket chains like Albertsons (Research) (which yesterday agreed to be sold to a group that includes CVS and Supervalu), Cub Foods (part of Supervalu), and privately held Piggly Wiggly, biometric systems are just one of several emerging payment technologies that retailers are currently experimenting with. Others include self-checkout (widely deployed at Home Depot), contactless cards like J.P Morgan Chase's "blink," and so-called "near field communication," which involves waving your cell phone, say, near a reader.

Here's how biometric payment works: To set up an account, customers scan their fingerprint at an in-store kiosk, enter their phone number, and then submit checking and credit card account information. To make a purchase, they place their finger on a scanner at the register, enter their phone number, and choose how they want to pay (credit, debit, or checking.)

The mere mention of bio-anything raises the hackles of privacy advocates, and this process is no exception. Vendors like San Francisco-based Pay By Touch, however, which recently acquired BioPay, its main rival in this space, insist that the fingerprint image itself is not stored. Instead, tiny measurements from the print are encrypted and stored, making it impossible to recreate a full fingerprint.

The benefits to customers are twofold. First, it offers a speedier checkout�70% faster than traditional forms of payment (unless the reader can't identify your finger, so keep those hands clean.) Second, it enhances security. Of the nearly 10 million cases of identity theft annually, according to a 2003 Federal Trade Commission survey, 13% occurred during a purchase transaction. "Biometric payment systems make conducting transactions safer for consumers," writes Kozloff.

But it's the benefit to retailers that could really drive adoption. Transaction fees paid by retailers for credit and debit card payments have soared of late, and can account for about 20% of pretax profits for a low margin retailer like Costco, Kozloff estimates. Retailers hate these fees (also called "intercharge fees") and have filed numerous lawsuits against Visa and MasterCard, some of which have attained class action status.

Paying by fingerprint is one way to lower these costs. With a biometric system, retailers can "steer" customers towards using their checking account, which incurs much lower transaction costs than credit and debit cards do. AMR Research's Scott Langdoc estimates that switching from credit cards to checking accounts could shave the net cost of a transaction by anywhere from 40 cents to 70 cents. "That's big money," he says.

Within three months of a pilot program at four Piggly Wiggly grocery stores, 15% of its customers who normally did not pay by cash enrolled in the Pay By Touch system. Those users increased their store visits by 15%, which translates into an additional 7,350 transactions a year. Not only did they come more often, those shoppers also spent 12% more on groceries.

"Grocery stores operate on such low margins that this makes sense for them," says Don Delzell, a partner at consultancy Retail Advantage.

But biometric is not without its concerns, chief among them privacy. The privacy issue "remains a deep bone of contention and will mitigate against pervasive usage," says David Robertson, publisher of The Nilson Report, an industry newsletter. One industry source calls biometric readers "clunky." And if enrollment is confusing or time-consuming, few shoppers will even bother.

"It's a leap of faith when retailers install the system," says industry consultant Ron Margulis. "But once shoppers are used to it, it can really take off." And it might even take retailers' sluggish stock prices along for the ride.

http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/24/magazines/fortune/pluggedin_fortune_biometrics/